glintr
Editorial Standards

How Glintr publishes, reviews and maintains content

Every learning guide, program page and glossary entry passes a documented review workflow. Nothing goes live without a named editor and reviewer.

Review workflow

  1. 1
    Draft

    Author writes the first version against a briefing and outline.

  2. 2
    Technical Review

    Subject-matter reviewer verifies technical accuracy and examples.

  3. 3
    Editorial Review

    Editor checks clarity, structure, tone and reading level.

  4. 4
    SEO Review

    SEO reviewer validates metadata, structure and internal links.

  5. 5
    Legal Review

    Only for regulated topics — verifies claims and compliance.

  6. 6
    Approved

    All required reviews signed off; ready for scheduled publish.

  7. 7
    Published

    Live on glintr.com with version, date and reviewer credited.

Supported stages: Draft · Technical Review · Editorial Review · SEO Review · Legal Review · Approved · Published

Fact-checking

Reviewers verify factual claims against primary sources. Unsupported claims are removed or reworded before publish. Every article carries its references, publisher and reliability rating on the page.

AI usage policy

Glintr may use AI tools to draft outlines, structure examples and suggest edits. Every AI-assisted article is reviewed by a human editor before publication and carries an "AI Assisted" badge. AI is never used to fabricate credentials, endorsements, partnerships or statistics.

Updates & corrections

Every page shows its published date, last-updated date and version. Substantive updates are recorded in the on-page changelog with a reason. Corrections can be requested via any article's feedback tool.

Roles

Author
Technical Reviewer
SEO Reviewer
Content Editor
Administrator

Meet the editorial team →

Find your best program